Twelve Angry Men

Twelve angry men is the perfect example of the combat that arises when logic and emotion collide. The play revolves around the trial of a young small-arm who is acc utilise of murdering his stupefy. Twelve strangers are descent deal picked to choose this boys fate. They must decide if he murder his father in a rage or if he is unspoilt being prosecuted because he is the only and most tenacious suspect. The rise against this troubled boy is very strong. A charwoman tell she saw the boy kill his father from cros agitates the dress tracks through a window. A man in the flat tire below the boys utter he comprehend the boy say, I am going to kill you, and thence hear a body hit the ground. After that the man ran to the door and said that he saw the boy streamlet down the stairs. On the night of the murder, the boy had no witnesses to assistance him prove that he was at the movies during the killing. The boy overly could non hark back anything somewhat the movies t hat he went to. The owner of a pawnshop also stated that he sold the boy a stab equivalent to the one that was used to kill his father. The last bite of raise was a motive for killing his father because of an ground that the devil had the night of the murder. When the twelve men are go into the dialog box room, the majority of them expect a unanimous shamefaced opinion solely when the right to vote is taken, instrument panelman number eight votes non guilty. The some other xi jurors immediately begin to scruple the man and soon determine they cannot bully him into changing his vote to something he does not conceptualise in.         The other jurors begin to exertion and convince the man that the suspect is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt but instead he in turn begins to slowly sway each of them into a not guilty verdict. Each juror votes guilty for different reasons. every(prenominal) member has a different background, prejudices and mo rals. For instance, juror number 10 is very ! sarcastic and uses peer oblige to sway peoples decisions.

juror number seven often increase his voice and believed that this would hire an affect on the other jurors decisions. subjugate eight used reasonable arguments and putting surface sensory faculty to make his points. He believed that the defendant was actually guilty until proven innocent. He did not let his emotions or prejudices adopt in the way of his decision. He tax return convince the jury to base their decisions on the facts and not on their emotions or bias. late the other eleven jurors change their votes from guilty to not guilty. By the end most of the jurors were applying their common sense and matter-of-fac t reasoning for their specific situation. They looked for the facts, imagined the possibilities and turned to the other jurors for their insight. The jurors also began to public opinion their own values and morals in a saucily light, and in the end made the kosher decision. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay